The fullness of emptiness
In Buddhism there is a term ‘no self’. Also the teachings on ’emptiness’
In Christianity there is a term ‘kenosis’. Is it possible that these apparently two different spiritual pointings are essentially the same?
Is there a fullness and grace to this emptiness and space?
Let us look first to Buddhism
The term refers to the central Buddhist doctrine that “there is in humans no permanent, underlying substance that can be called the soul.” … Anatta or Anatta-vada is also referred to as the “no-soul or no–self doctrine” of Buddhism.
What does this mean really?
Does it mean that the autonomous separate self is an illusion?
“Emptiness” is a central teaching of all Buddhism, but its true meaning is often misunderstood. … In other words, emptiness is not some kind of heaven or separate realm apart from this world and its woes. The Heart Sutra says, “all phenomena in their own-being are empty.”
Richmond quotes the third century Indian Buddhist master Nagarjuna who taught, “Emptiness wrongly grasped is like picking up a poisonous snake by the wrong end.” That is a pretty strong warning!
He goes on to conclude that
‘Emptiness is not complete nothingness; it doesn’t mean that nothing exists at all. This would be a nihilistic view contrary to common sense. What it does mean is that things do not exist the way our grasping self supposes they do.
The Dalai Lama calls emptiness “the true nature of things and events,”
The Heart Sutra says, “all phenomena in their own-being are empty.” What does “Own-being” mean? Does it mean separate independent autonomous existence? Does this mean that the phenomenal realm of names and forms and objects is all an expression of one ever changing landscape that is actually emanating from emptiness? From the peace and silence of the non phenomenal realm, the invisible spirit of the divine?
Richmond says ‘no individual person or thing has any permanent, fixed identity, everything taken together is what Thich Nhat Hanh calls “interbeing.” This term embraces the positive aspect of emptiness as it is lived and acted by a person of wisdom — with its sense of connection, compassion and love.’
The Dalai Lama himself is generous, humble, smiling and laughing — and we can see that a mere intellectual reading of emptiness fails to get at its practical joyous quality in spiritual life.
In other words “no self’ or emptiness in the context of the ‘Buddha Nature’ is endowed with qualities of the awakened mind like love, wisdom, compassion, joy and peace.
Richmond concludes that the Buddha saw why we suffer.
‘Ultimately we suffer because we grasp after things thinking they are fixed, substantial, real and capable of being possessed by ego. It is only when we can see through this illusion and open ourselves, in Ari Goldfield’s words, “to the reality of flux and fluidity that is ultimately ungraspable and inconceivable” that we can relax into clarity, compassion and courage. That lofty goal is what makes the effort to understand emptiness so worthwhile.’ (Richmond, Emptiness: The Most Misunderstood Word in Buddhism’ HUFFPOST
Now let us turn dear friends to Christianity and this passage from James 1 for a striking correlation between the Christian bible and the Buddhist sacred teachings.
‘When tempted, no one should say, “God is tempting me.” For God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone; 14 but each person is tempted when they are dragged away by their own evil desire and enticed. 15 Then, after desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, gives birth to death.
16 Don’t be deceived, my dear brothers and sisters. 17 Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows. 18 He chose to give us birth through the word of truth, that we might be a kind of firstfruits of all he created.’ James 1 v 16- 18
Two things strike me from this passage – that being ‘dragged away’ by our own automous and even ‘evil’ desires leads to sin and death. The cessation of selfish desires is exactly what the Buddha taught also. Also the possibility of liberation for all sentient beings, describing how release from craving is to be reached. ‘Craving’ is selfish desire.
In Buddhism the sutras represent the awakening and liberation of the Buddha (the awakened one)
By the way the Buddha is not a false idol to worship but a symbol of the ‘perfectly awakened being in each of us – our true nature and Self which is beyond divisions of class, gender, race or religion. The awakened one is the embodiment of the spirit of truth
The buddha represents the one who awakens from the sleep of ignorance into the timeless perfection of unborn awareness’ (Mooji)
The Gautama Buddha taught that unguarded sensory contact gives rise to craving and clinging to impermanent states and things. Which creates dukkha (suffering and pain) Nirvana (heavenly realm) is attained essentially by cessation of craving. This can be accomplished by confining our automatic responses to sensory contact by restraining oneself, cultivating discipline and wholesome states, and practicing mindfulness and and the state of perfect equality ‘dhyana” leading to our natural state. Samadi, peaceful and blissful and free from desire.
Doesn’t this strike you as pointing to the very same universal truth?
Returning to Christianity – KENOSIS (self emptying)
In Christian theology, kenosis [the act of emptying] is the ‘self-emptying’ of Jesus‘ own will and becoming entirely receptive to God’s divine will. The word ἐκένωσεν (ekénōsen) is used in Philippians 2:7, “[Jesus] made himself nothing …”
Kenosis is used both as an explanation of the Incarnation and an indication of the nature of God’s activity and will. Mystical theologian John of the Cross‘ work “Dark Night of the Soul” is a particularly lucid explanation of God’s process of transforming the believer into the icon or “likeness of Christ”. (wikipedia)
In protestantism it is seen that God is self-emptying. He poured out himself to create the cosmos and the universe and everything within it. Therefore, it is our duty to pour out ourselves.
The Orthodox Mystical Theology of the East emphasises following the example of Christ. Kenosis is only possible through humility and presupposes that one seeks union with God.
Kenosis is not only a Christological issue in Orthodox theology, it has moreover to do with the Holy Spirit. Kenosis, relative to the human nature, denotes the continual self-denial of one’s own human will and desire. With regard to Christ, there is a kenosis of the Son of God, a condescension and self-sacrifice for the redemption and salvation of all humanity. Humanity can also participate in God’s saving work through theosis; becoming holy by grace.
Therefore, in Eastern Orthodoxy, theosis never concerns becoming like God in essence or being but instead, it concerns becoming united to God by grace, through his Energies. Kenosis therefore is a paradox and a mystery since “emptying oneself” in fact fills the person with divine grace and results in union with God.
Kenosis in Orthodox theology is the transcending or detaching of oneself from the world or the passions, it is a component of dispassionation.
The ‘Invitation’ by Mooji is this kenotic ‘death to self’, it is self emptying in the most direct, natural and simple way and it is also discovery of the light of grace, unity with God.